[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11228: Bug in ls?
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
bug#11228: Bug in ls? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:59:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 04/12/2012 03:49 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Yes, the find command is a bit too much for me in.. regular interactive
> use - i.e. if it has even an outside chance of doing something I might
> regret, I usually choose to run a test first.. and if still in doubt..
> I back up the target tree(s).
>
> As to dotglob, I knew of its existence.. but it never made it to my
> active vocabulary.
>
> The problem with ‘shopt -s dotglob; command’ is that it leaves the
> option set for the ensuing session.
That's why I ran it in a (subshell)
cheers,
Pádraig.