[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:07:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
address@hidden wrote:
> Man you guys are bananas using "K" here:
>
> -c, --bytes=[-]K
> print the first K bytes of each file; with the leading `-',
> print all but the last K bytes of each file
It was much worse when we used "N" there. People were often getting
confused by it. Here is the thread where we changed it. Here are the
highlights:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-05/msg00124.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-05/msg00200.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-05/msg00278.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-05/msg00280.html
> Why can't you use "X" etc. etc.?
Hey, I jokingly suggested 'y'. :-) But more seriously there is no
perfect letter.
> It took 15 minutes for me to figure out that you weren't talking about
> kilobytes. Yes one only has to read down further. But kindly fix it anyway.
Bob
- bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes, jidanni, 2012/12/17
- bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes,
Bob Proulx <=
- bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes, jidanni, 2012/12/17
- bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes, Pádraig Brady, 2012/12/17
- bug#13216: head(1) man page not talking about kilobytes, jidanni, 2012/12/17
- bug#13216: notsp: Everybody knows K bytes is kilobytes, jidanni, 2012/12/17
- bug#13216: notsp: Everybody knows K bytes is kilobytes, jidanni, 2012/12/17