[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available
From: |
Johannes Schauer |
Subject: |
bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Oct 2018 22:17:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
alot/0.7 |
Quoting Paul Eggert (2018-10-07 22:14:11)
> Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Which other tests should I perform?
> I'd like to see a test using glibc without a fake root, as that's the most
> common way this code will be used.
Which test result would you like to see?
I have coreutils with that patch running on my system and in the chroot and mv
seems to be working fine as far as I can see.
signature.asc
Description: signature
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Andreas Henriksson, 2018/10/06
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/06
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Johannes Schauer, 2018/10/07
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/07
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available,
Johannes Schauer <=
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/07
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Johannes Schauer, 2018/10/07
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/08
- bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Assaf Gordon, 2018/10/30
bug#32796: please consider using renameat2 from glibc if available, Johannes Schauer, 2018/10/09