[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
Subject: |
bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111) |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:55:42 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
Thanks Bernhard,
On 2019-04-15 2:14 p.m., Bernhard Voelker wrote:
I can easily reproduce here on my regular openSUSE:Tumbleweed from latest git:
$ src/date --debug '+%-Y' -d '- 2010 years'
[....]
date: error: adding relative date resulted in an invalid date: '(Y-M-D)
0009-04-15 22:10:37'
This makes it easy to pinpoint (hooray for "--debug" :) ).
This error is given if gnulib's "mktime_z" fails
to convert the adjusted "struct tm" to "time_t"
(adjusted because its tm_year was decremented by 2010).
https://opengrok.housegordon.com/source/xref/gnulib/lib/parse-datetime.y#2177
To see if this is glibc issue, or perhaps an gnulib/mktime_z wrapper
issue, can you (and/or others) try the attached C program?
It calls time(2)+localtime(3)+mktime(3) to emulate the date adjustment.
Because the adjustment is to year 9 (about 1961 years before epoch),
the time_t value is negative. perhaps that's the issue? or perhaps
combined with a specific timezone it becomes problematic?
On my system it gives:
----
$ gcc -o inv-year inv-year.c
$ ./inv-year
time() = 1555361050
localtime() = 2019-04-15 14:44:10
(mday=15 wday=1, isdst=1)
struct tm (after adjustment) = 0009-04-15 14:44:10
(mday=15 wday=1, isdst=1)
mktime() after date adjustment = -61874070118
----
regards,
- assaf
inv-year.c
Description: Text Data
- bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111, O. Emmerson, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111, Paul Eggert, 2019/04/15
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), O. Emmerson, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), C de-Avillez, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), Assaf Gordon, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), Bernhard Voelker, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111),
Assaf Gordon <=
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), C de-Avillez, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), O. Emmerson, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), C de-Avillez, 2019/04/15
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), Paul Eggert, 2019/04/16
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), Assaf Gordon, 2019/04/16
- bug#35289: closed (Re: bug#35289: date+%-Y -d "- N years" errors when N > 111), C de-Avillez, 2019/04/16