[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: repository is broken
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: repository is broken |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2001 23:50:36 -0400 (EDT) |
Pavel Roskin writes:
>
> ** expected:
> U realmodule/a
> cvs [a-z]*: Executing ../tmp/cvs-sanity/cvsroot/checkout\.sh. .realmodule..
> checkout script invoked in .*
> args: realmodule
> ** got:
> U realmodule/a
> checkout script invoked in /tmp/cvs-serv13285
> args: realmodule
> cvs server: Executing ''/tmp/cvs-sanity/cvsroot/checkout.sh' 'realmodule''
> FAIL: modules5-8
>
> It seems to be a trivial problem with sorting the output. However, this
> makes me wonder if "make remotecheck" is a part of the release procedure.
Yes, it is. There is a race condition that occasionally causes out-of-
order output from a few of the modules tests. If you re-run the test,
it will likely work fine. I don't want to sort the output, because you
really want to get the message that CVS is running the script before you
see any output from the script. Unfortunately, I haven't figured out a
reliable way to avoid the race yet.
> Maybe "make check" should include the remote testing? The later should
> exit gracefully (i.e. with code 0) if the binary doesn't include server
> support (now it fails).
No, there's "make remotecheck" to run the remote tests.
-Larry Jones
These findings suggest a logical course of action. -- Calvin
- repository is broken, Pavel Roskin, 2001/04/27
- Re: repository is broken, Martin Neitzel, 2001/04/27
- Re: repository is broken, Larry Jones, 2001/04/27
- Re: repository is broken, Pavel Roskin, 2001/04/27
- Re: repository is broken, Larry Jones, 2001/04/27
- Re: repository is broken, Pavel Roskin, 2001/04/27
- Re: repository is broken,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: repository is broken, Pavel Roskin, 2001/04/28
- Re: repository is broken, Larry Jones, 2001/04/28
- Re: repository is broken, Derek R. Price, 2001/04/29
- Re: repository is broken, Derek R. Price, 2001/04/29
Re: repository is broken, Larry Jones, 2001/04/27
Re: repository is broken, Martin Neitzel, 2001/04/27