[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS server patch?
From: |
Mike Sutton |
Subject: |
Re: CVS server patch? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:37:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
I'm also interested in Larry's approach. I patched 1.10.2 to do
something very similar.
On 03/17/03 12:02:52, Derek Robert Price wrote:
> Larry Jones wrote:
>
> >I wrote a similar patch a long time ago but never committed it because
> >there didn't seem to be much demand. I used "*" rather than "+", and I
> >interpreted a username of "*" to mean any system user. That provided a
> >wealth of flexibility and completely eliminated the need for SystemAuth
> >in the config file (which is good because then all the access control is
> >in a single place): adding "*:*" to the end of the CVS passwd file would
> >be the same as SystemAuth=yes, not having it would be the same as
> >SystemAuth=no. If there's interest, I can resurrect my patch.
> >
> >
>
> I don't see why that shouldn't be committed to the experimental branch.
>
> Derek
>
--
Mike Sutton | public class
SAIC | software_failure : management_failure
Beavercreek, OH |
Suttonm at saic . com | These are MY opinions, not SAIC's