[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "P" status from update
From: |
Frank Hemer |
Subject: |
Re: "P" status from update |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:16:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 04:49, Larry Jones wrote:
> Rahul Bhargava writes:
> > Sounds like a good idea.
>
> Looks like I'm in the minority. Go for it, Derek.
I assume this will in the same way affect the output of '-n update'?
If so, please consider that this will cause compatibility issues with cvs
frontends ...
The U/P in this case provides some extra information:
U: new file
P: file already there but new revision
Regards
Frank
- "P" status from update, Derek R. Price, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Derek R. Price, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Derek R. Price, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Rahul Bhargava, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/11/15
- Re: "P" status from update,
Frank Hemer <=
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/15
- Re: "P" status from update, Jim Hyslop, 2005/11/15