Scott Dwyer wrote:
The programmer in me would like detail, so "1:30:00" would be my
preference. But I think that if this option is chosen, then it should
be in the format something like "0d:1h:30m:00s", so that there would
be no mistake when looking at a glance.
Thanks. Screen space is limited, and I think "0d:1h:30m:00s" is too
long to fit. I'll try to include as much detail as possible in the
space available. Maybe "0d:1h:30m".
Best regards,
Antonio.
_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue