bug-ddrescue
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-ddrescue] configure DDRescue to retry disks that unexpectedly go of


From: Robert Imhoff
Subject: [Bug-ddrescue] configure DDRescue to retry disks that unexpectedly go offline
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:15:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0

Hello !

First of all many thanks for an incredibly useful piece of software!

A small suggestion for a feature improvement is the following:
I've just been working on recovering a defective WD10TMVW drive that has the USB interface integrated on the drive's PCB. Due to the hardware failure, the drive goes completely offline after trying defective sectors, causing DDRescue to abort with an error message that the input file cannot be found (it is being accessed directly, as /dev/sdh, not as a partition). After a short pause, the drive comes back online, but DDRescue has already aborted and needs to be manually relaunched.

So I thought it would be a useful feature that in such cases, instead of aborting, DDRescue could be configured to automatically retry input files after a certain interval.

If I may also ask a question here, it concerns the importance of the physical sector size of the input and output drives being identical. In particular, the defective drive has physical sectors of 4096 bytes, and logical sectors of 512. The only destination drive I had available has both physical and logical sectors of 512 bytes. The files can still be recovered on the clone, but the main and backup MFT are lost (it's an NTFS partition), and the recovered files’ names are not retrieved (for example with R-Studio or ZAR).

My question is whether this could be due to the mismatch in physical sector size, or whether it's just because the directory data is in the defective region of the drive? (it lost the first 50 GB out of a total 1TB drive). Doesn't the file access happen in the logical sector size anyway, no matter what the physical sector sizes are?

Many thanks!
Robert



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]