[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updatedb files portable?
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: updatedb files portable? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:25:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:02:50AM -0600, Peter Fales wrote:
> Using the "new" database looks like it will work for us. I was under
> the impression that the format changed between 4.1 and 4.2.26, so
> that --old-format was needed to stay compatible with 4.1, but that's
> is apparently not the case.
I try quite hard not to create gratuitous incompatibilities.
> And, yes, new format databases seem to be portable across our
> various platforms. Thanks for the help.
I should add in some test suite tests that relate to continued support
for the old database format. Could you please generate a locate
database in the old format on Solaris (with any version of findutils,
but ideally both 4.1.x and 4.2.27) so that I can use it as a test
input? Ideally this would contain less than 5 files or so, so that we
an avoid any need for a copyright assignment. Any old junk filenames
will do (but not anything confidential obviously).
Many thanks,
James.
- updatedb files portable?, Peter Fales, 2005/12/06
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/06
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/08
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Peter Fales, 2005/12/08
- Re: updatedb files portable?,
James Youngman <=
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Peter Fales, 2005/12/08
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Andreas Metzler, 2005/12/10
- Re: updatedb files portable?, Eric Blake, 2005/12/10
- Re: updatedb files portable?, James Youngman, 2005/12/10