Re: --findoptions no

[James Youngman]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Karl Berry <address@hidden> wrote:
>     I can't think of a way that doesn't involve editing the updatedb
>     script.  Sorry.
>
>  (So, some practical examples of --findoptions would seem a good thing to
>  add to the manual.)
>
>  Anyway, so now I'm back to my original request for a customization
>  option.  How about this: a new envvar POSTPRUNE?  As in:

The patch looks OK I guess but I think it's quite likely that in any
case updatedb will end up as a C program that may not in fact invoke
find at all.

James.