[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: faster version of find (for -exec)?
|
From: |
Peng Yu |
|
Subject: |
Re: faster version of find (for -exec)? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:02:03 -0500 |
The point is not to call an external program. For example, if there is
a `find` tool made in python, so that I can specify a python
expression to the tool (to replace the function from the external
program), then everything will be run within one process, which avoid
the spawning of new processes.
My question is if there is such a `find` tool available.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:58 AM, James Youngman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just in case Bernhard Voelker's response didn't already cover
> everything you needed, what are you trying to achieve? What is the
> size of the workload? How fast would be "fast enough"?
>
> James.
--
Regards,
Peng