[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Feature request -- field indices for split
From: |
fork |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Feature request -- field indices for split |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:50:23 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Aharon Robbins <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Hello. Thank you for your mail.
> (I don't know what "ETL" means here.)
"Extract Transform Load" -- an acronym specifically designed to make a process
seem more complicated and fancier than it is. Data munging, esp with SAS.
> As you point out, your requested feature is redundant with FIELDWIDTHS.
> I don't think this feature is used much as it is, and I am loathe to add
> yet another feature that almost noone will ever use. Gawk already
> has too many of those, that seemed like good ideas at the time but
> in retrospect were not.
Of course that is a reasonable point of view, and I am not offering to submit a
patch (so I really have no ground to stand on), but ... it might be that
causality is mixed up here: FIELDWIDTHS is not used as much as it should be
(possibly) because it is painful (oh the calculations! woe! woe!) to deal with,
and not because the use-case is wrong. However, my pet FIELDINDICES might
enable a swarm of new SAS programmers to use Gawk with much less friction. And
there are LOTS of SAS programmers...
To see how SAS does it, look at item #2 here:
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/modules/input.htm
Also -- how would you determine whether a feature is used much or not? Just
curious (ie not accusatory).
Thanks for your reply!