Re: [bug-gawk] An gawk problem.

[蔡光宗]

Thank you for your reply and i can't imagine that you would be so quick to reply me(so i was late for this reply).

I feel very sorry for my late reply mail.

The following are the :

1. The version of gawk :

$ gawk --version

GNU Awk 3.1.8

2. The operating system i am using :

Ubuntu 12.04

($ uname -a

Linux cruzer-online 3.2.0-51-generic-pae #77-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 24 20:40:32 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

)

3. Where did i get the gawk:

When i install the system on my computer, the gawk is contained on it.

Sorry again for my late email.

And i will try to do something as you told, I hope i can find the real problem.

2013/10/18 Andrew J. Schorr <address@hidden>

Hi,

> > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:41:54 +0800
> > Subject: An gawk problem.
> > From: ?????? <address@hidden>
> > To: address@hidden
> >
> > Hi, Dear Arnold:
> > Thank you for your work on gawk, and thanks for this useful tool so that i
> > can do some things easily.
> >  But recentlly, i have a problem with gawk, i am not sure that this can be
> > called a bug, because i can't determine if this is related to my machine's
> > performance. The following is my problem:
> >
> > awk '{NAME[$1]++}; END {for (name in NAME) print NAME[name], name}'
> > ip_address.txt | sort -nr | head -n1000 | awk '{print $2}'
> >
> > I want to use the command above to get the top 1000 visiter's IP address.
> > When the size of ip_address.txt is small, everything is OK. But when the
> > size of ip_address.txt up to 1 Gbyte, the command above don't have any
> > results and still runing after 3 days.(Meanwhile, the memory of my computer
> > has been swallowed up)

Is it gawk or sort that is taking so long?  If on linux, you can use "top"
or "ps" to try to figure that out.  Or change your command to tell you when
the initial awk command has completed:

awk '{NAME[$1]++}; END {for (name in NAME) print NAME[name], name; print "Debug: awk first pass finished" > "/dev/stderr"}' ip_address.txt | sort -nr | head -n1000 | awk '{print $2}'

Regards,
Andy