Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]

[arnold]

"Andrew J. Schorr" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:36:40PM -0600, address@hidden wrote:
> > I think this patch addresses all your issues.
>
> Perhaps, although flush_io calls is_non_fatal_redirect before there's
> an I/O error. I still dislike doing that lookup before anything bad happens.
>
> It's also not obvious to me whether calling update_ERRNO_int(errno) after
> flush_io returns is going to work. Is it possible that flush_io will make
> other calls after the failed call that could reset errno?
>
> Regards,
> Andy

OK, I've adjusted the code to address these things as well and
pushed out the changes.

Thanks,

Arnold