[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH] |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Mar 2017 22:35:58 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:06:05 -0400
> From: "Andrew J. Schorr" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Using lots of platform-specific ifdefs is really ugly and
> error-prone and hard to maintain.
Indeed. What's more, it makes the results of running Gawk on
different platforms unpredictable.
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], (continued)
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/29
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/29
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/03/29
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/03/29
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/29
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/03/29
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/25