[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?
|
From: |
Andrew J. Schorr |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 09:55:33 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 04:27:46PM -0500, Ed Morton wrote:
> Might be useful until a fix is available. Any better ideas for now?
I have no better ideas, although I can't imagine that such a solution would
please anyone. Here's a crazy question: do you ever use FPAT for anything other
than CSV parsing? If gawk had a proper CSV parser library, would we need FPAT
at all? I don't think I have ever used FPAT (my personal CSV parsing library
takes a brute force string scanning approach), and it seems from the observed
bugginess that FPAT is not often used...
Regards,
Andy
- [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Ed Morton, 2017/04/01
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/04/01
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Ed Morton, 2017/04/01
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Manuel Collado, 2017/04/02
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Ed Morton, 2017/04/02
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, arnold, 2017/04/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Ed Morton, 2017/04/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Manuel Collado, 2017/04/05
- Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Arnold Robbins, 2017/04/12
Re: [bug-gawk] FPAT bug?, Ed Morton, 2017/04/01