Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2

[Andrew J. Schorr]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:53:14AM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> Combined patch attached. Eric -- can you please confirm this fixes your issue?
> 
> Arnold -- does this look right to you? I haven't chased down all the nuances
> of what this assign function is doing...

Note: we may have a similar ordering problem at debug.c:1301.

And at interpret.h:373, I'm not sure how Op_field_spec_lhs really works and
what's going on with the field_assign value...

-Andy