Re: The thread/float/NaN bug in GDB 5.1, a survey

[bart . durinck]

Hi,

I also think it's worth tracking down. Don't have a lot of time, though...
Any clues where/how to start looking?!

Bart





Kevin Buettner <address@hidden>@gnu.org on 12/07/2001 09:05:44 PM

Sent by:  address@hidden


To:   address@hidden, address@hidden
cc:

Subject:  Re: The thread/float/NaN bug in GDB 5.1, a survey


On Dec 7,  3:22pm, address@hidden wrote:

> But when I recompiled GDB with the default optimilisation level -O2
> and ran it on another "production" machine (vanilla Mandrake 8.1,
> PentiumII), I got NaNs again! Same GDB on a identically configured
> Mandrake 8.1 (PentiumIII), no problem... It is CPU related. But how?!

Bart,

If you have the time, I think it'd be worth tracking this problem
down...

Kevin

_______________________________________________
Bug-gdb mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gdb