[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gettext] recursive install-pdf fails in po directory (was: Re:
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gettext] recursive install-pdf fails in po directory (was: Re: bison-2.5 released [stable]) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:18:31 +0200 |
Hi all,
I don't understand what is going on here. This patch has been
sent already to bug-gettext and bug-gnulib, but each time it
seems to have caught no attention. I agree this patch
addresses a very minor flaw, yet a genuine one. These
targets are explicitly mandated by the GCS:
> @item install-html
> @itemx install-dvi
> @itemx install-pdf
> @itemx install-ps
> These targets install documentation in formats other than Info;
> they're intended to be called explicitly by the person installing the
> package, if that format is desired. GNU prefers Info files, so these
> must be installed by the @code{install} target.
This issue affects *all* the projects that use Gettext, and the
fix is straightforward, so please, if something is wrong about
it, help me fix it.
FWIW, this patch, and a few others waiting for some feedback,
are holding the release of Bison 2.5.1.
Cheers,
Akim
Le 9 avr. 2012 à 10:15, Akim Demaille a écrit :
>
> Le 6 avr. 2012 à 14:46, Akim Demaille a écrit :
>
>> [sorry, I meant to Cc to bug-gnulib, but forgot to do so]
>>
>> Hi Bruno, Hi gettexters!
>>
>> I have not seen answers to this message. Was something done in
>> gettext about this? I see there is a gnulib/build-aux/po/Makefile.in.in
>> that exists, which is silently different from that of Gettext,
>> but which has the same problem. Should the patch be sent to
>> gnulib instead?
>
> This is the said patch, prepared for gnulib instead of Gettext.
>
> I see no .PHONY in that file, so none was added. What's the
> rationale?
>
> Thanks!
>
> <0001-Fix-recursion-of-install-into-po-directories.patch>
0001-Fix-recursion-of-install-into-po-directories.patch
Description: Binary data