[bug-gettext] [bug #53071] JSON as alternative to (G)MO

[Bruno Haible]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #53071 (project gettext):

> Why? (g)mo is just a container format. Why should json for translation
catalogs be more?

Good point. Maybe you are right.

> > Still, we should deal with LINE SEPARATOR and PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR

I'm referring to http://timelessrepo.com/json-isnt-a-javascript-subset and
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg03146.html .

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53071>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/