RE: printf bug

[Michael S. Fischer]

Ulrich Drepper [mailto:address@hidden writes:

> > printf is broken (at least according to the man page description of
> > zero-padding) under glibc 2.1.92 and 2.1.3:
> 
> I don't know where you got your information from, but it's wrong.  The
> 0 flag only applies to numbers.

You're right; I'm sorry.  I downloaded the ANSI C99 spec and it's clear that
%s is not covered.   I'll make sure my folks are made aware. 

--Michael