[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cost of popen()
From: |
Shigio Yamaguchi |
Subject: |
Re: cost of popen() |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jul 2005 11:55:56 +0900 |
> > Doesn't this patch bring user visible change?
>
> Yes. There are two user visible changes.
They should be treated separately from the performance tuning.
> - When multiple files are processed by a parser,
> a verbose message containing the comma-separated file names is displayed.
Is this change needed?
New log messages will make the screen full.
> - Assembly sources are not skipped while creating GSYMS.
> They are skipped by judgment of the parser.
This seems to be unrelated to the tuning.
Is it possible to commit this code as a separate one?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/01
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/01
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/01
- Re: cost of popen(),
Shigio Yamaguchi <=
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/01
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/02
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/02
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/02
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/03
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/03
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/03
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/04
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/04
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/04