[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CLN, GMP inputs
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: CLN, GMP inputs |
Date: |
11 May 2001 08:24:27 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5 |
Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:
>
> If a CPU would support instructions for
> +, -, *: 1-register x 1-register -> 2-register
> then the small number representations could be made very fast. (But I am
> told that many CPU's do not support that.)
Overflow detection is always possible, whether it's particularly
convenient or not is another question.
> GMP would only need to define the basic arithmetic operations involving
> __mpz_struct; the ones involving native integral types could be macroed on
> top of them.
Yes, if smallnum operations matter then they don't want to be burdened
with a function call every time.
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, (continued)
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/03
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Kevin Ryde, 2001/05/02
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/03
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Kevin Ryde, 2001/05/05
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/05
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Kevin Ryde, 2001/05/05
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/06
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/06
Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/03
Re: CLN, GMP inputs, Hans Aberg, 2001/05/07
- Re: CLN, GMP inputs,
Kevin Ryde <=