[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]censorship
From: |
Gary Benson |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]censorship |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:02:29 +0000 |
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, [iso-8859-1] Tom Chance wrote:
> I agree that there should be a simple way of removing
> very poor articles, and perhaps reviews/comments by
> consensus of opinion. Perhaps there should be a group
> of moderators as with /. that could have the final say
> on removing an article. Afterall, if somebody got a
> load of friends to help him/her, or just resubmitted
> the bad review many times, any article could easily be
> removed.
Have a look at http://www.advogato.org/
Advogato is "a community resource for free software developers around
the world, as well as a research testbed for work on group trust
metrics." Advogato's `trust-metric' seems quite clever as it resists
this kind of attack. See http://www.advogato.org/trust-metric.html for
the gory details.