[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnupedia] Re: [Bug-gnupedia]humour
From: |
Dries van Oosten |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnupedia] Re: [Bug-gnupedia]humour |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:37:46 +0100 (MET) |
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Tom Chance wrote:
> What about if you write an article and want to put in
> some humour, for instance my friends and I have an
> unnatural obsession with canoes (if anyone saw the
> "pork" version of the talking billy bass they'd
> understand!). Is this going to be entirely serious, or
> should funny bits and more interestign writing styles
> be included? I say they should, just so long as the
> actual factual part of the article remains clear-cut.
Parodies and humour are valuable qualities of human nature.
If someone writes a funny item, it goes into the catagory "funny" or
whatever and is cross-referenced with a serious article about the subject.
That way, people that want to read serious stuff, get the funny stuff as a
bonus and vice versa.
Groeten,
Dries