[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnu-arch] Re: [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnu-arch] Re: [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:41:15 +0100 (CET) |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > From: address@hidden
>
> > Code that goes into the main distribution needs to be robust. As
> > I said - I'll happily merge this -once- the validation code to
> > prevent accidental SNAFU's is in place. While giving the user
> > rope is a good thing, getting this wrong would be quite a
> > headache for the user - a corrupted archive could result (at
> > worst), and at best their changes wouldn't get committed -
> > they'd lose data in that they couldn't backout changes or
> > recover previous version. I appreciate the importance to folk in
> > large projects, and the preload trick to break hardlinks
> > automatically may be useful too.
>
> > So strictly speaking: the validation code is needed before I
> > merge this.
>
> Quite right.
I'll be busy til mid january, I'm very sorry I won't be able to do
anything til then. Anyway, my opinion is that not allowing this is the
same that not allowing rm :) Let the user shoot on their feet if they want
to as they can always delete the files from the library too. But I
understand your position, I'm not totally against, it's just that I cannot
undertake it now.
Pau
- [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks, nobody, 2003/11/08
- [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks, nobody, 2003/11/12
- [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks, nobody, 2003/11/13
- [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks, nobody, 2003/11/14
- [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks, nobody, 2003/11/19
- [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5644] tla get --hardlinks, nobody, 2003/11/19