[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: find-file-literally and "raw reading"
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: find-file-literally and "raw reading" |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jan 2001 13:09:01 +0200 |
> From: jari.aalto@poboxes.com (Jari Aalto+mail)
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
> Date: 06 Jan 2001 01:18:56 +0200
>
> These functions are good for preventing buffer translation
>
> find-file-literally
> insert-file-contents-literally
>
> but it would be even beter if the functions took additional prefix
> argument to control other possible actions that may aoccur when the
> file is loaded.
>
> Proposed prefix argument would completely disable any kind of
> treatment of the buffer, like:
>
> auto-mode-alist
> interpreter-mode-alist
> find-file-hooks
> find-file-not-found-hooks
>
> ...coding systems..
Are you asking for this feature on the user level or on the Lisp
program level?
The latter is already available: you can bind the appropriate data
structures to nil programmatically before calling insert-file-contents
or similar functions, and get the effect you want.
If you are asking for this on the user level, please explain in what
kind of situation would a user want anything like that. Note that
there are already user-level facilities to turn off coding conversions
and file handlers. Why do we need more?