[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -Xlinker and LDFLAGS
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: -Xlinker and LDFLAGS |
Date: |
11 Jan 2001 00:16:10 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.95 |
>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
>> This
>> means that emacs has to be treated differently from other packages;
>> for instance, you can't use an LDFLAGS value such as
>> -Wl,-R/thing/to/add/to/run/path.
Why do you need the -Wl in practice?
[I agree that the current system is unfortunate and I recall not
understanding the prefix-args business.]
EZ> Does it work to say "LDFLAGS=whatever ./configure", and then "make"?
That propagates a different default set to the Makefile and may affect
configured features, but it won't address this issue as such.