[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no need for where-is to list losing completions
|
From: |
Dan Jacobson |
|
Subject: |
Re: no need for where-is to list losing completions |
|
Date: |
22 Jan 2001 09:19:17 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 |
[Eli, your messages had no References header here on netnews. This
spoils my thread tracking.]
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
Eli> On 21 Jan 2001, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> May I suggest that the list of completions for C-h w (where-is) be
>> limited to only those commands that have bindings.
Eli> This is against the purpose of "C-h w". If you remove commands
Eli> that aren't bound, users might think that an unbound command
Eli> doesn't exist.
Naw, like I said last message,
Dan> If I want to know about the others I could use C-h f
Dan> (describe-function).
and TAB around in there.
--
http://www.geocities.com/jidanni Tel886-4-25854780 e-mail:restore .com. 積丹尼