[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unicode in emacs 21
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: unicode in emacs 21 |
Date: |
29 Oct 2001 17:49:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.107 |
>>>>> "MK" == Markus Kuhn <mgk25@cam.ac.uk> writes:
MK> Using UTF-8 as the internal Emacs encoding is one way of achieving
MK> continued guaranteed binary transparency,
I.e., maintain a malformed internal representation??
MK> coming up with a tricky encoding for malformed UTF-8 sequences is
MK> another one.
We can maintain arbitrary byte sequences now. It's not terribly
tricky, just not too robust through the use of the eight-bit-x
charsets.
I don't think it's very important that reading and writing malformed
sequences by utf-8.el isn't always idempotent. Presumably the three
or four relevant test cases could be addressed in the CCL, but I think
there are better things to spend the time on.
- unicode in emacs 21, Oliver Doepner, 2001/10/25
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, David Starner, 2001/10/27
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Janusz S. Bień, 2001/10/28
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Dave Love, 2001/10/28
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/29
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/29