[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot
From: |
Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot |
Date: |
26 Nov 2001 15:57:41 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
Eli> On 24 Nov 2001, Dan Jacobson wrote:
E> What's your point? Isn't it obvious that a Lisp code run by an
E> interpreter would be slower than a tight optimized C program?
>>
>> I dunno, maybe internally have the real grep to do the hard work, by
>> default, but keep the original occur code around for in case the user
>> does not have grep on their operating system?
Eli> We have "M-x grep" for those who have Grep.
but that's if the buffer is associated with a file... so one must C-x
C-w ... first
--
http://www.geocities.com/jidanni/ Tel+886-4-25854780
- occur slower than grep by a longshot, Dan Jacobson, 2001/11/22
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/22
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Dan Jacobson, 2001/11/24
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/25
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot,
Dan Jacobson <=
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, David Kastrup, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, David Kastrup, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, David Kastrup, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/25