bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Feature suggestion for switch-buffer


From: Tom Tromey
Subject: Feature suggestion for switch-buffer
Date: 27 Jan 2002 17:32:20 -0700

This bug report will be sent to the Free Software Foundation,
 not to your local site managers!!
Please write in English, because the Emacs maintainers do not have
translators to read other languages for them.

In GNU Emacs 20.5.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu, X toolkit)
 of Mon Feb 21 2000 on porky.devel.redhat.com
configured using `configure  --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib 
--sharedstatedir=/var --with-gcc --with-pop --with-x-toolkit 
i386-redhat-linux-gnu'

Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:


I have a feature suggestion for switch-buffer.
Suppose I have two buffers, "foo-one" and "foo-two".
If I'm looking at foo-one, and type:

    C-x b foo TAB

it would be convenient if "foo-two" appeared in the minibuffer.  That
is, I think it would make sense for switch-buffer to assume that I
don't want to switch to the buffer I'm currently viewing; the current
buffer could be removed from the list of completions unless it is the
last completion item -- "foo-o TAB" should still complete correctly.

This is a small thing, but whenever I run into this situation I find
myself wanting it.


Recent input:
C-z o C-x b F o tab v tab return C-x C-f return y e 
s return C-v C-l C-u C-p C-u C-p C-l C-x b return C-c 
b C-x b return C-a C-l M-v C-r m e r g e C-a C-u C-u 
C-p C-l C-s i s _ u n C-w C-w C-w C-s C-s C-s C-s C-g 
C-z o C-x b F o tab v tab return M-x e m a c s - b 
tab M-backspace M-backspace b u g - e m tab M-backspace 
M-backspace e backspace r e p o r t tab return

Recent messages:
Wrote /x2/tromey/.newsrc
Saving /x2/tromey/.newsrc.eld...
Saving file /x2/tromey/.newsrc.eld...
Wrote /x2/tromey/.newsrc.eld
Saving /x2/tromey/.newsrc.eld...done
Quit
Mark saved where search started
Quit
Loading emacsbug...
Loading emacsbug...done

Tom



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]