bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Solaris 8 patches 108652-51 and 108919-14 break `make install'


From: Rabbe Fogelholm
Subject: Re: Solaris 8 patches 108652-51 and 108919-14 break `make install'
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 18:07:26 +0200

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > From: Rabbe Fogelholm <eubrafo@operamail.com>
> > Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
> > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:53:53 +0200
> >
> > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/bootenv/emacs/emacs-21.2/lwlib'
> > > gcc -c   -I/usr/openwin/include  -I/usr/dt/include    -g -O2  
> > > -DEMACS_BITMAP_FILES -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Demacs -I. -I../src 
> > > -I/usr/local/bootenv/emacs/emacs-21.2/lwlib 
> > > -I/usr/local/bootenv/emacs/emacs-21.2/lwlib/../src xlwmenu.c
> > > In file included from /usr/openwin/include/X11/Xos.h:81,
> > >                  from xlwmenu.c:32:
> > > /usr/include/strings.h:25: conflicting types for `memmove'
> > > /usr/include/iso/string_iso.h:62: previous declaration of `memmove'
> > > /usr/include/strings.h:26: parse error before `0'
> > > /usr/include/strings.h:26: warning: conflicting types for built-in 
> > > function `memset'
> > > make[2]: *** [xlwmenu.o] Error 1
> > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/bootenv/emacs/emacs-21.2/lwlib'
> > > make[1]: *** [really-lwlib] Error 2
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/bootenv/emacs/emacs-21.2/src'
> > > make: *** [src] Error 2
> >
> > A workaround is to back out the 108652-51 patch, which requires that
> > 108919-14 is backed out first. After doing this the `make install'
> > target succeeds.
> 
> Thanks for this important information.  However, in the hope that it's
> possible to make Emacs build even with the recent patches, could you
> please post the offending lines from the header files about which the
> compiler complains, as well as any other lines (such as macro
> definitions etc.) which are involved in this?  Maybe we can make a
> change in Emacs to work around those problems.
> 
> TIA

I'm not too sure about which parts of the files that are relevant. I
have mailed them in "before" and "after" condition to you Eli, hopefully
you can sort out what is worth posting. Let me know if you need more
files.

--Rabbe



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]