[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see |
|
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:21:12 +0300 |
On 9 Jul 2002, David Kastrup wrote:
> It is perfectly understandable if one thinks some things not worth
> fixing or doing correctly.
I didn't say this isn't worth fixing, I just pointed out that it's a part
of a general pattern.
- dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Dan Jacobson, 2002/07/08
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/09
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Dan Jacobson, 2002/07/10
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, David Kastrup, 2002/07/10
- Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/10