Re: *shell* TAB *Completions* fooled by $PWD/

[Andreas Schwab]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai writes:

|> miles@gnu.org (Miles Bader) writes:
|> 
|> > Annoying little wrinkle (1): you don't actually know who's listening
|> > when you send input to the subprocess -- it may be the shell you
|> > started, it may be some process running under the shell...
|> 
|> That could be "solved" by documenting it properly: just say that C-u
|> TAB sends input to the remote shell and that things will break if
|> there is no remote shell.
|> 
|> After all, RET isn't all that different: it also just sends input to
|> the remote end, and it doesn't care whether it's really a shell...

This is quite different because after sending input with RET you don't
expect any particular response.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."