[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding
From: |
Thomas Morgan |
Subject: |
Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding |
Date: |
05 Sep 2002 13:39:34 -0400 |
I wrote:
I understand now that utf-8-fragment-on-decoding has no direct effect
on decoding, but it is still not clear to me what indirect effect it is
supposed to have when it is set through Custom. Right now it applies
to CCL programs, but not to decode-char. Is that correct?
If so, perhaps that should be documented.
When I think about it more carefully, I see that decode-char's
doc string is unambiguous when it says "the result is translated
through the char table `utf-8-translation-table-for-decode'".
For the sake of careless readers like me, could something like this
be added after that sentence?
(Note that this char table is independent of the translation table
of the same name which CCL programs use, and it is not affected by
the user's setting of utf-8-fragment-on-decoding.)
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, (continued)
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Kenichi Handa, 2002/09/04
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Dave Love, 2002/09/04
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Thomas Morgan, 2002/09/05
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Dave Love, 2002/09/05
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Thomas Morgan, 2002/09/05
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Dave Love, 2002/09/07
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Thomas Morgan, 2002/09/07
- Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding, Dave Love, 2002/09/09
Re: decode-char & utf-8-fragment-on-decoding,
Thomas Morgan <=