[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I bet bug-gnu-emacs doesn't even use SpamAssassin
From: |
Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
I bet bug-gnu-emacs doesn't even use SpamAssassin |
Date: |
21 Jan 2003 03:42:56 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
(CC) Dear sysadm@gnu.org, surely SpamAssassin would have caught
From: "Micheal Izaghi" <m_izaghi@consultant.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:59:12
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
<bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
under the NIGERIAN_TRANSACTION category? OK maybe not, but still I
don't see any use of SpamAssassin in your headers, though there is
some wording about spam. Mainly the MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLEs are the
worst, using many bytes.
You might filter with lines like
if $h_X-Spam-Status: matches
"KOREAN_UCE_SUBJECT|X_LIBRARY|FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD|MARKETING_PARTNERS|FROM_NO_USER|\
RATWARE|MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE|NIGERIAN_TRANSACTION|X_OSIRU_SPAM(WARE_SITE|_SRC)"
--
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780
- Attention Please, Micheal Izaghi, 2003/01/19
- I bet bug-gnu-emacs doesn't even use SpamAssassin,
Dan Jacobson <=