[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unrmail
From: |
Jonathan Kamens |
Subject: |
Re: unrmail |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 01:33:45 +0000 (UTC) |
Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com> writes:
>The Received: header added by the local MTA would be even closer to
>the time the message was actually delivered.
True, but it's not worth the effort to parse the Received: header, whic
his in a relatively free-form format -- the Date: header is good
enough, especially since, as you point out, very little software
actually uses the date in the From_ line. What I'm objecting to is not
even trying *that* hard to put a useful date in the From_ line.
- unrmail, Philippe Robert, 2003/07/23
- Re: unrmail, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/07/24
- Re: unrmail, Jonathan Kamens, 2003/07/25
- Re: unrmail, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/07/25
- Re: unrmail, Jonathan Kamens, 2003/07/25
- Re: unrmail, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/07/25
- Re: unrmail,
Jonathan Kamens <=