[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation
|
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
|
Subject: |
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation |
|
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:28:21 +0100 (CET) |
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Writing "MS-DOG" is a common practice for us--it is not an error.
But it does look unprofessional. Hmm...perhaps I've just mislaid my sense
of humour.
--
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | Il ne vaut pas la peine de peigner l'eau
- Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Reuben Thomas, 2004/01/17
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/18
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation,
Reuben Thomas <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/01/19
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, David Kastrup, 2004/01/20