[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation |
Date: |
20 Jan 2004 10:47:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il> writes:
> So I think whatever juvenile and unprofessional attitude follows
> from this, it's been out there for so long that nothing can now
> change our image in people's eyes, and any damage it could have
> possibly done to the free software movement is already done.
Only if nobody bothers reading a manual nowadays that he has not
already read and memorized before.
I do get this impression sometimes, but then where would the point be
in maintaining manuals in the first place?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/01/19
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Sam Steingold, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20