[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inconsistent bindings of backspace and delete between X and xterm
From: |
Dale Hagglund |
Subject: |
Re: inconsistent bindings of backspace and delete between X and xterm |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:35:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> Dale Hagglund <rdh@yottayotta.com> writes:
>> Also, is there any reason why `ESC [ 3 ~' shouldn't be mapped to
>> <delete> instead of <deletechar>.
[I'm not quite what part of my message your response referred to, but
I'm assuming it's to the sentence above.]
> This is a property of the terminal description. For xterm it
> contains `kdch1=\E[3~' (terminfo) or `kD=\E[3~' (termcap), thus `ESC
> [ 3 ~' is mapped to <deletechar>.
I poked around a bit in term/*.el but I didn't see where the termcap
interpretation is happening. That aside, wouldn't it still be better
to use the generate the same <delete> function key for for the same
physical key both under X and xterm (or a real vt220, for that
matter)?
Dale.
Re: inconsistent bindings of backspace and delete between X and xterm, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/07
Re: inconsistent bindings of backspace and delete between X and xterm, Dale Hagglund, 2004/02/07