[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in clone-indirect-buffer and clone-indirect-buffer-other-window
|
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bug in clone-indirect-buffer and clone-indirect-buffer-other-window |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:43:59 -0500 |
The second discrepancy is: although the info page indicates that the only
difference between clone-indirect-buffer and clone-indirect-buffer-other-window
is that the latter selects the buffer in another window, I do not believe that
this is the case. The clone-indirect-buffer function accepts an argument and
prompts for a name while the clone-indirect-buffer-other-window function
ignores any numeric argument.
I would like to see the clone-indirect-buffer-other-window function accept
an argument as well.
I will do that. Thanks.