|
From: | Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: | Re: browse-url-of-dired-file vs. .gz |
Date: | Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:58:34 -0600 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) |
Dan Jacobson wrote:
browse-url-of-dired-file on file.html.gz doesn't first uncompress it.
Should it? If your browser is smart enough to figure out that a .html file is text/html and a .jpg file is image/jpeg, why can't it figure out that a .gz file is application/x-gzip? The point of browse-url-of-file (which browse-url-of-dired-file calls) is to pass the file name to the browser to display it. -- Kevin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |