Re: vc with rcs does not generate correct versions

[Uwe Brauer]

>>>>> "Thien-Thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:

   > under RCS, a revision number is never a simple integer.  there is
   > always at least one dot.  in the above tests, you may see results
   > more consistent w/ your expectation if you use "-p1.2" and
   > "-p1.3".  that is, the "1." is not optional.


You are very right, with the exception of p1 instead of p1.1. I swore
that remembered that one should drop the
1. I just checked with GNU emacs and Xemacs, vc-version-other-window
   given the full version number like 1.3 works fine. 

Thanks very much and sorry for the silly mistake.

Uwe