[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining
|
From: |
jidanni |
|
Subject: |
bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining |
|
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:56:50 +0800 |
$ emacs -Q
M-x man man
One notices the total lack of underlining emphasis vs. $ man man in the shell,
or M-x woman. What should be underlined appears as plain text. Or
maybe it's just me... emacs-version "22.2.1"
By the way, woman shows the table in that page as 1@Executable... however.
- bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining,
jidanni <=