|
From: | Guillaume Salagnac |
Subject: | bug#1155: 23.0.60; GUD hangs |
Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:06:52 +1000 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) |
Note: it's been a long time between the moment I started writing this e-mail, and the moment I finished it, so please bear with me until the end. Nick Roberts wrote: Hi,> I try to debug a program with M-x gdb, like I did in the past, but it > does not seem to work in recent emacsen. gdb starts (in a *gud* > buffer) but does not respond to commands. Even a simple "help" does > not suceed. > > Maybe I am doing something wrong (then please correct me), but it does > work fine in emacs 21. I experienced the same behaviour here in an emacs > 23.0.60.1 and 22.1.1 (all three versions as shipped in ubuntu hardy) M-x gdb works differently in Emacs 21, but similarly in Emacs 22.1 and Emacs 23.0.60. Emacs 22.1 has been included with many distributions including Ubuntu Hardy and there have been few bug reports, so I suspect it has something to do with your set up. the behaviour I describe is of course when starting emacs with -Q ; therefore, I do not suspect my (emacs) setup. For the external setup, I would be glad to verify it, if you could indicate me any pitfalls. As long as emacs finds gdb, I thought it should be fine. BTW, and this drives me crazy, sometimes-it-work-and-sometimes-it-doesnt (tm). My suspicion is that the problem perhaps comes from the way emacs communicate with gdb : what if there are different instances of gdb running at the same time on the machine ? what if there are other emacsen ? what if those emacsen also happen to run gdbs ? Anyway, when it does not what I want, I switch to emacs 21, and this one works. Still, it is not satisfying :-) Yes.Have you read the node in the Emacs manual about bug reporting? exactly the same ; actually, this is the first thing it tried (but with -Q)In particular what happens if you don't load your .emacs, i.e., start Emacs with "-q"? GNU gdb 6.8-debian (the one by default in ubuntu hardy)What version of GDB are you using? I don't know: on http://ists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug , the last message is from july 2007, saying that the list is discontinued. But maybe I missed something.> BTW, this is my first bug report, but it is my second try : > M-x bug-report seems to be address messages by default to > emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org that goes nowhere. But maybe I am perhaps > doing something wrong. emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org is an active mailing list and the right one for reporting bugs in Emacs 23.0.60. Maybe there is something wrong with your mail server. When I type "M-x gdb", the text by default in the minibuffer is "Run gdb (like this): gdb --annotate=3 foo", where "foo" is a random executable file in my home directory. All the <backspace>s are to remove everything up to just "gdb" (the second one of course ; I do not modify the prompt)> ... > Recent input: > M-x g d b <return> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> > <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> > <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> <backspace> > <backspace> <return> h e l p <return> C-c C-c M-x r > e p o r t - e m a c s - b u g <return> What text do you have in the mini-buffer when you type <return> for the second time? But hey ! that does seem to make a difference. In my home directory, I start emacs 23 with -Q and I type M-x gdb. The text by default is "gdb --annotate=3 .zshrc". If I just press return, I can ask for "help" and get gdb help. If I remove everything but "gdb", so as to choose my "file" and my "set args" later, it does not work. Hoho (typing as I'm reading the web) : the online documentation of gdb (not the man page, not the info page, not the gdb --help) mention this option, and says : http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb_3.html#IDX37
Now remains the questions as to why it does work like a charm in emacs 21 without this option, and also why the necessity of this option for gud is documented nowhere (if I, the end user, am not allowed to remove this option from the command line without breaking GUD, either I should not be allowed to remove it, or at least I should be warned.) But yes, for the moment I am back in emacs 23 for my debugging activites. yay ! Thanks again, -G |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |