|
From: | Emacs bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#1190: marked as done (patch - fix crash in ftfont rendering) |
Date: | Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:10:05 -0700 |
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:03:55 -0400 with message-id <87ljwdlevo.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> and subject line Re: patch - fix crash in ftfont rendering has caused the Emacs bug report #1065, regarding patch - fix crash in ftfont rendering to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com immediately.) -- 1065: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: patch - fix crash in ftfont rendering Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:39:13 +0900 User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) I'm very sorry for the late response. In article <E1KlP9J-0006lR-Cr@www9.emo.freenet-rz.de>, klchxbec@freenet.de writes: > This is a fix for a crash in otf font rendering. Emacs crashed for me when > gsub_gpos->FeatureList.FeatureCount > was zero and otf_langsys->FeatureCount was 2377. [...] > - for (features = Qnil, k = otf_langsys->FeatureCount - 1; k >= 0; k--) > + for (features = Qnil, k = gsub_gpos->FeatureList.FeatureCount - 1; k > >= 0; k--) As this part is collecting features for a specific language, the above change is not good. I'll fix the code so that invalid otf_langsys->FeatureCount doesn't lead to crash. Could you tell me which font causes this problem? --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: patch - fix crash in ftfont rendering Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:03:55 -0400 I believe Handa's 2008-10-24 change fixed this.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |