bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#1407: marked as done (end keyword bug)


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#1407: marked as done (end keyword bug)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:55:05 -0800

Your message dated Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:45:00 -0500
with message-id <m163mdefer.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#1407: end keyword bug
has caused the Emacs bug report #1407,
regarding end keyword bug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1407: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1407
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: end keyword bug Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:35:06 +0000 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Package: emacs,octave

[ resent from
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-10/msg00166.html ]

Hello,

Thank you for your work on the emacs octave-mode!

Has the incorrect indentation when the end keyword is used as an array
index been fixed?  Currently, any use of end other than to close a
loop or conditional block confuses the indentation of octave-mode.

Example:

for c=1:C
    Lambda(lastGood_Lambda(c)+1:end,c) = sigma;D_c(c) = M;
  endfor

The octave-mode thinks that the end used as an array index is the end
for the for loop.

If this has been fixed, where should I download the latest, fixed,
stable version?

Thank you,

dan elliott



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#1407: end keyword bug Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:45:00 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
"Juanma Barranquero" wrote:

> Does this problem still happen with the latest Emacs code from the
> CVS? Apparently it was fixed some time ago.

My mistake; I forwarded what I thought was an old unanswered bug, but
you are right, it is fixed. (I was thinking it was about font-lock
rather than indentation.)


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]