[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:24:37 -0400 |
C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET
d
s
is one command that prompts twice (with the patch you proposed).
Yes, prompting twice is the specific purpose of that patch.
So far, you are the only person who wants a command to prompt twice.
If people would generally like that, I won't object. However, you
alone don't constitute "people in general". Let's see what others
think, if they care.
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, (continued)
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/14
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/14
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/15
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/17
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/17
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd,
Richard M Stallman <=
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/20
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Stefan Monnier, 2009/04/20
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Stefan Monnier, 2009/04/18